James Delingpole James Delingpole

It is left to me to point out this regrettable, overlooked fact: Dave blew it

James Delingpole says You Know It Makes Sense

issue 15 May 2010

This is a column I never thought I’d have to write. I’d assumed that the conclusions to be drawn from the general election were so bleeding obvious that I could leave all the post-match analysis to the experts, while I distracted you with something more cheerful like, say, a piece about Fergal Keane’s brilliant new book on the battle of Kohima.

Apparently not, though. It seems that my job today is to point out an awkward fact that seems to have eluded about 98 per cent of political commentators in the mainstream media and 99.99 per cent of those Conservatives who invested their faith in Project Cameron: Dave blew it.

No, really. He did. Never mind that nonsense about the biggest swing since 1931, making the party electable again, tremendous achievement, best he could have hoped for and all the other desperate apologiae we’ve been hearing of late. Dave had an open goal — or at least one manned only by a cackhanded, decrepid, one-eyed nutcase, viscerally loathed not just by the opposition but by half his own team — and the best he could manage was to hit the post.

Normally when the star striker fluffs his team’s first serious chance of winning a major championship in over a decade, it is customary for opprobrium to be poured on his tactics and abilities and for a transfer to be considered by the team’s owners. What isn’t at all usual is for the commentators to say, ‘Well, of course, if the goal posts had been a foot further apart, as they should have been, the Boy Dave would have been laughing.’ Nor is it usual for the players on the team to say: ‘We’re really happy with the result. We never actually intended to win outright. It was always our plan to end up in a victory-share arrangement with Crapville Arthritic, whereby we get to borrow each other’s players, training facilities and tactics for our mutual benefit and in football’s interest.’

Illustration Image

Disagree with half of it, enjoy reading all of it

TRY 3 MONTHS FOR $5
Our magazine articles are for subscribers only. Start your 3-month trial today for just $5 and subscribe to more than one view

Comments

Join the debate for just £1 a month

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for £3.

Already a subscriber? Log in