Annabel Denham

Is this the end of the gig economy?

(Photo illustration by Matthew Horwood/Getty Images)

Before too long, news that Uber will offer 70,000 drivers holiday pay and the national living wage will be viewed less as an unmitigated triumph than a Pyrrhic victory. In the UK you can be an ’employee’ with an ever-growing raft of employment rights, a ‘worker’ with rather fewer rights, or ‘self-employed’. These statuses have different implications for tax purposes.

Last month, the UK Supreme Court, ending a six-year case brought by two Uber drivers, ruling that the ride-hailing firm must classify drivers as workers rather than self-employed. This week, the consequences of that judgment begin to be felt — though it is the government’s fault that, in repeatedly failing to grasp the nettle and draft a new law fit for the 21st century, an issue as important as the gig economy was left to the courts.

While Uber’s PR machine is firing out statements around ‘quality of work’ and ‘additional benefits’, it takes a short memory to forget that this is precisely what the ride-hailing firm fought against for half a decade.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in