Oscar Edmondson

Do we need the BBC World Service?

Cutting any of the 42 foreign-language services would risk losing indispensable diplomats like Anatol Goldberg

Anatol Goldberg presenting on the BBC Russian Service in 1976. Image: BBC 
issue 25 March 2023

In 1957 the BBC removed the head of the Russian Service. Anatol Goldberg was by all accounts a remarkable broadcaster, tasked with coordinating, producing and narrating the BBC’s radio output to the USSR at one of the most volatile periods of the Cold War. Internal reports praised his navigation of the ‘complications’ of Russian programming. So why was he demoted? The answer lies in the long history of British government interference in the World Service. 

Today harmony reigns between state and Service: the government announced a one-off £20 million payment to the World Service in last week’s updated Integrated Review. Yet last year foreign-language broadcasting was facing a £28 million cut after the licence-fee freeze. The message is confusing: is the World Service superfluous, or a vital adjunct of British diplomacy? Goldberg’s story makes an intriguing case for its indispensability.

Leafing through his transcripts from the 1950s, it is easy to see the revolutionary potential of radio broadcasting.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in