With Primark open, parents can once again buy cut-price school uniforms for their children. Whether those children will get to wear them before they grow out of them is an open question. The government has abandoned plans to get all primary school children back into the classroom before the end of term, and Matt Hancock has questioned whether secondary school children will even be back in September.
But was it necessary to close schools at all? The Imperial College Report 9 of 16 March is credited with changing the government’s coronavirus policy and sending the country into lockdown. Yet the report did not really press for closing schools. Its data suggested that taking this action would only reduce total deaths by between 2 and 4 per cent. A more pressing reason for closing schools, it concluded, was to reduce the peak load on the NHS. However, two months since deaths peaked, with hospital admissions continuing to trend down and the Nightingale hospitals mothballed, it seems legitimate to ask if ‘protecting the NHS’ is now the only priority to consider.
All along, it has been evident that there is a huge disparity in the effect of Covid-19 on the young and the very old, with the former hardly touched by the virus.
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in