Is the deal struck between the UK and French governments on policing Channel crossings really going to make a difference? MPs don’t seem to think so, with Suella Braverman getting a rather chilly reception from her own side in the Commons this afternoon. The Home Secretary signed the deal this morning, and returned to tell Home Office Questions that this was a ‘step change and a step forward’. But she also admitted, after criticism from Tory MPs, that it was important not to ‘overplay’ what it meant.
The Home Secretary cannot win politically on hotel bookings for asylum seekers, or on Channel crossings
Braverman was criticised by Dover MP Natalie Elphicke, who said: ‘Regrettably the modest French agreement falls short of what is needed to address the scale, the impact and urgency of the crossings. We don’t need more observation: we need action taken on the French side. For even today, as the ink was drying on the new deal, small boats crept through the sea mist and one even landed on a beach in a residential coastal village in my constituency.

Get Britain's best politics newsletters
Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in