Isabel Hardman Isabel Hardman

Is Braverman’s French Channel migrant deal a sign of progress?

Suella Braverman signing a deal with the French Interior Minister Gerald Darmanin to tackle Channel crossings (Credit: Getty images)

Is the deal struck between the UK and French governments on policing Channel crossings really going to make a difference? MPs don’t seem to think so, with Suella Braverman getting a rather chilly reception from her own side in the Commons this afternoon. The Home Secretary signed the deal this morning, and returned to tell Home Office Questions that this was a ‘step change and a step forward’. But she also admitted, after criticism from Tory MPs, that it was important not to ‘overplay’ what it meant. 

The Home Secretary cannot win politically on hotel bookings for asylum seekers, or on Channel crossings

Braverman was criticised by Dover MP Natalie Elphicke, who said: ‘Regrettably the modest French agreement falls short of what is needed to address the scale, the impact and urgency of the crossings. We don’t need more observation: we need action taken on the French side. For even today, as the ink was drying on the new deal, small boats crept through the sea mist and one even landed on a beach in a residential coastal village in my constituency.

Get Britain's best politics newsletters

Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Isabel Hardman
Written by
Isabel Hardman
Isabel Hardman is assistant editor of The Spectator and author of Why We Get the Wrong Politicians. She also presents Radio 4’s Week in Westminster.

Topics in this article

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in