You may notice that today’s Spectator looks a little different. We have updated our design, introducing some new features and bringing back some old ones. I suspect that a good number of our readers will not really notice the new design as such – just, I hope, that the magazine looks better. As ConservativeHome says, why tamper with a winning formula? I know that many CoffeeHousers would not dream of paying for dead-tree publications, but for those who are interested in these things I thought I’d run through what we have done, and the thinking behind it.
The problem really hit me last Christmas, when a friend of mine bought a subscription for his father. I wrote his father a letter – basically, a user’s guide to The Spectator. Where to find Taki (usually tucked away under motoring or gardening); the fact that our books section – contrary to its modest show in the magazine – is actually the best in London, if not the world; and so on.
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in