Helen Nugent

Insurance claims, comparison sites, employment and energy bills

Lying on an insurance claim should not necessarily invalidate it, the Supreme Court has said, in a judgement likely to affect all household policies.

It said collateral lies – which are untrue, but do not affect the validity of the claim – can be acceptable. The BBC reports that the judges voted by four to one to change one of the important principles behind current insurance law. The insurance industry called it a ‘blow for honest customers’, and warned that the price of policies could rise. The case involved a Dutch cargo ship, which ran into difficulty after its engine room was flooded. The owners deliberately lied, by saying the crew couldn’t investigate an alarm, because the ship was rolling in heavy seas. In fact the accident was caused by bad weather, so the lie was irrelevant, the court ruled.

Kevin Pratt, consumer affairs expert, MoneySuperMarket, said: ‘Today’s landmark judgment by the Supreme Court in the case of Versloot Dredging v HDI Gerling overturns centuries of insurance practice – and is great news for honest insurance customers.

Get Britain's best politics newsletters

Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in