Like most country dwellers, I have a sneaking admiration for the fox but for the hedgehog I have real affection. So I was entertained to find references to these creatures which might help Downing Street decide who to appoint to the governorship of the Bank of England, for which applications close on Monday. Both draw on the philosopher Isaiah Berlin’s categorisation of great thinkers according to a fragment from the ancient Greek poet Archilochus: ‘The fox knows many little things, but the hedgehog knows one big thing.’
In The Signal and the Noise, published this month, the US political forecaster Nate Silver argues that ‘hedgehogs’ with big, fixed ideas make lively pundits but are very often proved wrong, while ‘foxes’ who rely on empirical evidence from multiple sources are more likely to make accurate predictions. A second reference cropped up in a recent speech by Bank of England executive director Andrew Haldane: ‘Historically, financial supervision has been long foxes and short hedgehogs,’ he observed, but crucial to the development of a better oversight system than the one that allowed the banking crisis to happen will be ‘well-honed rules of thumb’ rather than layer upon layer of complexity: ‘That means having staff with a nose for a crisis (like a hedgehog) as well as ears and eyes (like a fox).
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in