Given all the hoo-hah surrounding Prince Charles’s decision to allow a granite stone memorial to be placed in a secret and remote spot on Dartmoor in memory of his friend the poet Ted Hughes, I expected to encounter something along the lines of Cleopatra’s needle when I went to look for it last week.
The objections to Ted Hughes’s memorial were many and various. Environ- mentalists were concerned about soil erosion caused by the feet of hordes of literary pilgrims and paint pot-wielding feminists. Levellers complained about the exception being made to the ‘no memorials’ rule applying on Dartmoor. What’s so special about a poet? they said. Why not a farmer? Regional patriots were disgusted because Hughes was a Yorkshireman. And republicans raised their voices against it simply because Prince Charles had had a hand in organising its transport by army helicopter. Poor old Ted. A great English poet, a children’s champion and the last shaman of the tribe — vindictively hounded by ideological opponents and pea-brains even after his death.
The stone’s location was a well-kept secret until 2003, when a BBC reporter found it and broadcast its whereabouts.
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in