In defence of VAR

There isn’t much that unites the fractious, dysfunctional football family. But in the UK, at least, there is something most fans seem to agree on: VAR – Video Assistant Referee – is awful.

The technology, introduced to limit errors and controversy, appears to be having the opposite effect. Critics speak of VAR as if it were a malevolent spirit tormenting players, supporters, and coaches alike. Its frequent manifestations usually involve lengthy pauses resulting in seemingly random judgements. Onlookers – particularly those watching in the stands – are often left perplexed and enraged.

This week, in a classic VAR episode, Spurs were denied a thrilling, potentially lucrative, last second winner in their Champion’s League tie with Sporting Lisbon – thanks to VAR. This triggered the excitable Spurs coach Antonio Conte who flew into a wildly gesticulating rage that earned him a red card. Was his fury justified?

Well…no. Conte’s anger signified nothing in the end. The decision was exceedingly tight, and the protracted delay tedious, but VAR was correct.