Raphael Hogarth

If the Lords try to end the Brexit nightmare, it will only end badly

We could be heading for a colossal constitutional showdown. Earlier this week, Baroness Wheatcroft told the Times that she and other peers are hoping to muster up a Lords majority against the invocation of Article 50, even if the Commons votes in favour. This would be extremely dangerous. Confrontations on this scale can be resolved in three ways. All end badly for the remainers, the Lords and the country.

First, there’s packing. The government can fill (or at least threaten to fill) the Lords with sympathetic peers to get its legislation over the finishing line, provided the monarch agrees. The most fractious and feverish confrontation between the chambers, over the Great Reform Act 1832, was resolved this way. Earl Grey, a Whig, was determined to widen the franchise to at least some of the burgeoning middle class and do away with the ‘rotten boroughs’, constituencies so small that the choice of MP was in the hands of a bribable few.

The Conservatives, the party of Land, capital-L, wouldn’t have it – until, that is, Earl Grey persuaded King William IV to pump the House full of Whigs.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in