Peter Hoskin

I suspected Maleficent would be terrible from the very first shot

In their latest offering Disney have taken the best of Sleeping Beauty and put it among the worst

Engaging: Angelina Jolie as Maleficent [Getty Images/Shutterstock/Alamy/iStock] 
issue 31 May 2014

If a gang of knife-wielding toddlers ever presses you for the name of the best Disney film, Sleeping Beauty (1959) is a pretty good answer. It has everything you expect from those features animated during Walt’s life: a simple story translated from a fairy tale; beautifully painted castle and forest scenes; a baddie that you can really root against, and all that. But it also has more: widescreen; a wild and luminous colour palette; and a score borrowed from some bloke called Tchaikovsky. Today’s animators are given to cooing about its invention and daring. I’d join them if I had a switchblade raised to my knees. Even if I didn’t.

Which brings us bloodlessly to the latest film from Walt Disney: Maleficent. This is what they call a ‘reimagining’ of the studio’s original Sleeping Beauty movie. It is live-action rather than animated. It shifts its attention away from Aurora, the Sleeping Beauty, and on to Maleficent, the villainess…or is she? And, in what is the most wonderful innovation of all, it’s also grade-A awful.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in