The Spectator

How to save the Union

The Spectator on Malcolm Rifkind's answer to the West Lothian question

issue 03 November 2007

When Nigel Lawson was Chancellor of the Ex­chequer, he liked to say that the problem with tax simplification was that you always end up complicating tax, too. The same is true of much constitutional reform: any attempt to remove an anomaly will often create another.

New Labour’s devolution experiment responded to the desire of the Scottish and Welsh people for greater autonomy. In so doing, however, it has created new and growing grievances among the people of England. It is this sentiment that Sir Malcolm Rifkind’s deposition to the Tory party’s Democracy Task Force is meant to address: Sir Malcolm proposes that an English Grand Committee be established in the House of Commons to consider English business in which only the members for English constituencies would be able to vote. This would tackle the longstanding ‘West Lothian question’, labelled as such by Enoch Powell after the constituency represented by the Labour MP, Tam Dalyell, who raised the issue forcefully in the devolution debates of the 1970s: why should a Scottish MP be able to vote on matters relating to England when an English MP cannot vote on matters relating solely to Scotland?

New Labour’s answer to the West Lothian question has been to ignore it.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in