When Nigel Lawson was Chancellor of the Exchequer, he liked to say that the problem with tax simplification was that you always end up complicating tax, too. The same is true of much constitutional reform: any attempt to remove an anomaly will often create another.
New Labour’s devolution experiment responded to the desire of the Scottish and Welsh people for greater autonomy. In so doing, however, it has created new and growing grievances among the people of England. It is this sentiment that Sir Malcolm Rifkind’s deposition to the Tory party’s Democracy Task Force is meant to address: Sir Malcolm proposes that an English Grand Committee be established in the House of Commons to consider English business in which only the members for English constituencies would be able to vote. This would tackle the longstanding ‘West Lothian question’, labelled as such by Enoch Powell after the constituency represented by the Labour MP, Tam Dalyell, who raised the issue forcefully in the devolution debates of the 1970s: why should a Scottish MP be able to vote on matters relating to England when an English MP cannot vote on matters relating solely to Scotland?
New Labour’s answer to the West Lothian question has been to ignore it. ‘Now that we have devolution up and running,’ Lord Irvine said when still Lord Chancellor, ‘I think the best thing to do about the West Lothian question is to stop asking it.’ The government’s sole response has been to cut the number of Scottish MPs from 72 to 59 — a gesture which does not address the heart of the matter at all.
Gordon Brown and his colleagues should recognise that there has been a change in the landscape of public opinion south of the border and that this cannot be dismissed (as it was at the 2001 and 2005 elections) as a matter raised vexatiously by wicked Tories.
Comments
Join the debate for just £1 a month
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for £3.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just £1 a monthAlready a subscriber? Log in