Niru Ratnam

How to fight back when ‘public art’ is not for the public

What ex-residents of Heygate Estate did about a planned sculpture that wasn't really about 'regenerating' the neighbourhood

[Getty Images] 
issue 08 February 2014

In recent years contemporary art and regeneration have gone hand in hand. Works such as Antony Gormley’s ‘Angel of the North’ have been visible and celebrated examples of regeneration. So when, last year, Southwark Council decided to sell Elephant and Castle’s seemingly unloved Heygate Estate (above) to Lend Lease for development into new homes, it seemed inevitable that public art would be utilised.

Artangel, the country’s most respected public art commissioning agency, announced plans for a work by the artist Mike Nelson that would take the form of a pyramid made from the estate’s building materials as it was dismantled. James Lingwood, Artangel’s co-director, stated that ‘the project would mark a moment between [the estate’s] past and future life’. Yet instead of an appreciative public, Artangel ran into a determined group of ex-residents, angry that the site of their recent forced upheavals was about to be turned into contemporary art, before being replaced by expensive flats.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in