Frank Field argues that a radical reform of Britain’s pensions policy could enrich both pensioners and the exchequer
Ten years of austerity must deliver the country a radicalism that ten years of abundance has failed to achieve.
The Prime Minister’s economic war council must decree that the necessary budgetary strategy also forges a radical agenda. Every secretary of state should be instructed to bring forward one major reform which, while cutting the size of a departmental budget, also begins to transform the political landscape. Combining these individual initiatives would lay the basis for a five-year reform programme, comparable to the models of 1906 and 1945.
The most obvious and necessary welfare reform is the one that seems the most expensive: the transformation of pension provision. No government has yet set itself the objective of abolishing pensioner poverty. That should, however, be the cornerstone of the next government. But how can this be achieved, and in a way that cuts the Work and Pensions budget?
We need, first, to understand why pension schemes that were the envy of Europe are now fast disappearing.
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in