Isabel Hardman Isabel Hardman

How ministers had to change tack in the EU referendum campaign

George Osborne harnesses the might of the Treasury machine today in the EU referendum campaign, publishing a weighty tome that tweaks 200 pages to warn of the consequences of Britain leaving the EU. He also warns of a ‘profound consequences for our economy, for the living standards of every family, and for Britain’s role in the world’. Those profound consequences include every family being £4,300 a year worse off as a result of Brexit, the Chancellor argues.

John Redwood has already dismissed the document – which hasn’t yet been published – as ‘absurd’. But what it does tell us is that the government has accepted that the security argument alone won’t win the referendum. This has come as a surprise to ministers: James Forsyth revealed that security would be the key theme of the Tory campaign to Remain in a cover piece earlier this year, and at the time the belief amongst those plotting the shape and tone of the campaign was that economic arguments wouldn’t hold as strong a sway because they would become festivals of figures that turned people off.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in