The Prime Minister recently blamed the delay in the resumption of amateur cricket on the ball itself, calling it ‘a vector of disease’. Happily, tests have disproved this. Balls contaminated with Covid-19 showed no trace of it 30 seconds later — and recreational cricketers will be allowed to return to the field from this weekend.
Much of the complexity of cricket comes from the interplay between wood, turf and the leather of the ball. Bats have changed greatly over the centuries, from curved to straight, from thick to thin and back to thick again, but the ball has remained much the same. A core of rubber and cork wrapped tightly with string, then encased in leather, stitched in a way to create a prominent seam running around the ball.
When the gentlemen gamblers took over cricket in the 18th century and bet vast sums on the outcome of matches, it became imperative that the balls be standardised. A bootmaker, Duke & Sons, diversified into making balls, won a royal warrant on the way and, 250 years later, produces the balls which are used in the current Test series.
But even if you won’t catch Covid from a cricket ball, there are many other reasons to be afraid of it. Frederick, Prince of Wales was thought to have died as the result of being struck by one in 1751. Since then a number of players and umpires have incurred serious injury in this way, most recently and tragically in November 2014 when the Australian Test batsman Phillip Hughes collapsed and died after being hit on the side of the neck by a short delivery.
This element of danger has always been there in cricket. In the early 18th century the professional cricketer George Brown bowled right-arm fast, underarm, supposedly once killing a passing dog with one delivery.
Comments
Join the debate for just £1 a month
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for £3.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just £1 a monthAlready a subscriber? Log in