When Lazard presented its results at the start of May, you might have expected the investment bank’s smooth-talking chairman Bruce Wasserstein to have been in upbeat mood. After all, Wasserstein trades on his reputation as the greatest mergers and acquisitions banker of all time. Lazard likes to think of itself as the finest M&A house in the world. And we are, in case you hadn’t noticed, going through one of the greatest merger booms of recent times: so far this year deals worth $2 trillion have been struck globally, a 60 per cent advance on the same point last year.
So was Lazard raking in money? Well, not quite. In truth, its results were disappointing: first-quarter profits up by a rather modest 4.9 per cent; advisory revenues flat; targets set by the share analysts missed; and the shares marked down on the day.
An ice-cream man who can’t shift his cones during a heatwave might wonder if he was in the right trade.
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in