Joshua Lieberman

Guston is treated with contempt: Philip Guston Now reviewed

The canonical American painter is exhibited, censored and chastised at Boston's Museum of Fine Arts – much like the Nazis did to ‘Degenerate Art’

Couple in Bed, 1977, by Philip Guston. Credit: The Art Institute of Chicago, through prior bequest of Frances W. Pick, and memorial gift from her daughter, Mary P. Hines, 1989.435 © The Estate of Philip Guston, courtesy Hauser & Wirth 
issue 20 August 2022

Philip Guston is hard to dislike. The most damning critique levied against the canonical mid-century American painter is that he is too uncontroversial, his appeal too broad, his approach altogether too winsome. None of that stopped the team behind Philip Guston Now – a travelling mega-survey of his work, which will reach Tate Modern in 2023 – from announcing otherwise. In 2020, the year the show was due to open, the curators announced that in light of the ‘racial justice movement’, the artist’s works might now legitimately be read as racist, and the show could not go forward as planned. This was and is quite obviously nonsense. The works in question are marshmallow-like renderings of Klansmen in absurd, mundane scenes. The KKK were a preoccupation for Guston, himself a Jew and target of the Klan. The team decided to bring in ‘more diverse voices… that allow us to appreciate the context in which Guston worked’, as though it were a year-long screening of Triumph of the Will.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in