It was always dangerous to let Gordon Brown near real voters. His election campaign has been constructed so that he meets as few as possible. Labour aides have been asked to pose as audiences. The Prime Minister has always been a backroom man: he is at his best with spreadsheets and opinions. He is easily irritated. Worse, he thinks that anyone who disagrees with him is either confused or malign. Now we know that he also regards his critics as ‘bigoted’.
The accidental recording of his comments after meeting Gillian Duffy in Rochdale is far more damaging than John Major referring to the Eurosceptic ‘bastards’. Cameras recorded the Prime Minister saying ‘good to see you’ as he left the woman, and trying on his rictus grin as he climbed into the car. And then: ‘That was a disaster. Whose idea was that?’ His first instinct was to find an aide to blame — and for what? For allowing him into contact with someone who had real questions to put to him?
More importantly, she spoke to him about the national debt, about education and (yes) about immigration. Is it ‘bigoted’ to have concerns about these issues? Mr Brown’s plans will, calamitously, almost treble public debt. As this magazine disclosed, his open borders policy means that 99 per cent of new jobs created since 1997 are accounted for by immigration. He has doubled the education budget, and yet we are hurtling down the international league tables.
With this gaffe, we see why Mr Brown plotted his route to No. 10 via scheming and backstabbing, rather than having to win votes, even in a leadership contest. To his question ‘whose idea was that?’ there is no answer: no one person is credited with inventing democracy.
Comments
Join the debate for just £1 a month
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for £3.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just £1 a monthAlready a subscriber? Log in