The Taliban are expanding their area of influence, NATO allies are eager to leave
Afghanistan, the forthcoming parliamentary elections are likely to be even more fraudulent than last year’s presidential election – in other words, how can it get any worse for
President Obama’s AfPak strategy?
Oh yeah, the man the US president has trusted to execute the strategy, the man whose name is now synonymous with the international community’s’ plan, General Stanley McChrystal gives an interview to Rolling Stone magazine (in itself a dubious choice), which paints a picture of the commander as insubordinate, unwise or simply not in control of his headquarters.
The fact that everyone has rushed to defend him, from NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen to President Hamid Karzai, merely suggests how much is riding on General’s McChrystal’s shoulders, not that he is blameless. In any other situation, he should probably have been fired.
But nobody can afford to bring a new commander up to speed, wait for that person to forge a link with the wily Afghan president and set to work on a plan everyone can agree on.

Get Britain's best politics newsletters
Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in