In the grand drama of an American presidential campaign, wondering whether Gary Johnson or Ron Paul will win the vestigial libertarian-minded vote in the Republican primary is but a tiny scene of little consequence whatsoever. At best it’s an Off-Off-Broadway production and even that might be a generous verdict. Nevertheless, it’s not without interest since it will shine some light on the heroic patriots who make up the “Tea Party”.
I considered this last November and now Ilya Somin asks the same question: Johnson or Paul? Like me, he’s a Johnson man. Will Wilkinson explains why, whatever Johnson’s merits, he’ll struggle to make an impression:
I think Mr Johnson’s gentle pragmatism, far from giving him a clear shot at independent voters, leaves him without a natural core of highly-motivated supporters.
As governor, Mr Johnson showed that a non-ideological, pragmatic libertarianism can work as a governing philosophy. But neither full-blooded libertarians nor allegedly liberty-loving tea-party enthusiasts really care much about governing.

Get Britain's best politics newsletters
Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in