A more scientific view of proceedings, courtesy of a Yale professor writing for The
Spectator’s Christmas issue in 1994:
What do you mean ‘Happy Christmas’?, Robert Buck, The Spectator, 17 December 1994
It is the time of year when the pursuit of happiness is at its most frantic. People believe they should be happy in the holiday period because they are surrounded by tradition, mercantile enthusiasm and a desire to return to childhood, where, for the most part, it did not require an effort to be happy.
Is the experience of happiness only psychological? We know that the reductionist trends of science must be leading towards a molecular theory of practically everything. Will Christmas get scrunched down to a molecular evil? Could we really have a happy Christmas if the effect and the experience are just chemical?
A chemical basis of unhappiness is now accepted. Many psychiatrists have told their patients that the reason for their unhappiness and depression is that they have a ‘chemical imbalance’.
Get Britain's best politics newsletters
Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in