James Walton

Fresh and wild | 31 May 2018

The whole cast was pretty terrific, turning Lear into something of an ensemble piece

issue 02 June 2018

I recently came across a theory of the American poet Delmore Schwartz’s that Hamlet only makes sense if you assume from the beginning that all the characters are drunk. Given Schwartz’s own fondness for booze, this idea perhaps smacks of drunken hyperbole itself. But it certainly sprang to mind while watching BBC2’s King Lear (Monday), where Anthony Hopkins spent quite a lot of the first half swigging enthusiastically from a hipflask.

After all, this did appear to explain much of Lear’s behaviour: the constant alternation between belligerence and sentimentality; the combination of self-dramatisation, self-pity and — the way Hopkins played it — self-amusement; and maybe even that initial decision to divide his kingdom in a spectacularly misguided bid to prevent ‘future strife’. (Might Lear have possibly woken up the following morning wondering just what the hell he’d done the night before?)

Directed by Richard Eyre, the programme opened in what seemed to be present-day Britain under military dictatorship.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in