Deborah Ross

Flaws with a clause

issue 12 May 2012

Jeff, Who Lives at Home is a film about Jeff, who lives at home, and that’s enough subordinate clauses for one day. (Don’t be greedy; you know how fattening they are.) It’s a comedy from the Duplass brothers, Mark and Jay, who have previously made small films that have been well received (The Puffy Chair, Cyrus), and this is their first big film although it’s a small big film, coming in at 83 minutes, which, in its small way, is quite big enough.

It’s a whimsical comedy and, as far as whimsical comedies go, it is quite whimsical, and sometimes comedic, which is fair enough, but ultimately it is slight and repetitive and nothing sticks in the mind. I’m not saying every film has to be laced with meaning or existential despair, or that I am always seeking such things — I am wondrously shallow; ask anyone — but I do think it has to give something beyond an arresting subordinate clause, as delicious as subordinate clauses are.

So, anyway, there’s this Jeff (Jason Segel) and he’s living at home — see how, thinking of your waistline, I rephrased that for you, fatty? — and Jeff lives at home in his mother’s basement, slouching about, watching infomercials and smoking weed.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in