Andrew Lambirth

Figures in a landscape | 10 November 2016

Timothy Hyman argues passionately for the human-centred approach of such ‘resistance fighters’ to expressionism as Balthus, Bonnard and Stanley Spencer

issue 12 November 2016

Timothy Hyman’s remarkable new book makes the case for the relevance of figurative painting in the 20th century, a period effectively dominated by modernist abstraction. He identifies an alternative tradition of potent human-centred painting, coming out of Cubism and Expressionism and tracing its lineage through Chagall and Leger, the Italians Carlo Carra and Mario Sironi, the Germans Max Beckmann, Otto Dix and George Grosz, to Stanley Spencer, Edward Burra and William Roberts.

Hyman claims many of the great independent artists for his argument — Balthus, Kirchner, Bonnard, Ensor — and registers them as resistance fighters in the war of influence and received opinion. He is not interested in traditionalist academic painting or straight realism, being more concerned with ‘artists who create narratives and microcosms’ who also wanted to renew pictorial language and explore the hard-won freedoms of Modernist painting. (Chief among these freedoms is the ‘licence to remain unfinished, to retain the evidence of process and making, to conjure up suggestion and ambiguity’.)

The overwhelming success of abstract painting was based on the belief that representation was somehow no longer relevant to humanity’s concerns, that it had failed mankind by not allowing access to the spiritual or metaphysical.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in