It’s only been two weeks since the Ockenden report on the maternity scandal at the Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust came out. That report criticised – among many other things – a focus on ‘normal birth’ and a low Caesarean section rate which had harmed some of the mothers and babies in the cases it had investigated.
Since then, though, there have still been job adverts going out from other NHS trusts for midwives who are interested in ‘normality’ – the common term for a vaginal delivery, preferably without instrumental intervention. These adverts give the impression that some sections of the NHS aren’t prepared to learn the lessons from Ockenden and are still promoting ideology over safe birth.
But there’s a pushback against this. I’ve been passed an email sent from NHS England to medical directors, chief nurses and chief midwives at trusts and local maternity systems warning about ‘language related to birth’.
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in