James Mcnamara

Endless petty squabbles

Family squabbles described in mind-numbing detail make one wonder what the point is of this — already dated — novel

issue 30 June 2018

I wrote foul-mouthed marginalia throughout Benjamin Markovits’s A Weekend in New York. Not because Markovits is a bad writer — he has a deserved reputation for excellence. But because this study of a privileged American family reaches for a significance it doesn’t achieve, and leaves a self-consciously literary novel with a surfeit of detail.

There are admirable qualities. Markovits’s prose is elegant; his portrait of New York is vivid; his characters feel authentic. Paul Essinger is a mid-ranked tennis player facing retirement. Over a long weekend, his donnish siblings reunite in New York for his final match. Nathan is a Harvard professor; Jean a producer involved with her married boss; Susie has declined tenure for more children; their parents, Bill and Liesel, are academics enjoying the fruits of boomer stability. Markovits’s close focus on four days in their lives explores family fault lines, and how their history defines them individually and collectively.

But the novel lacks discretion.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in