Derek Turner

Eager for beavers: the case for their reintroduction

As flood-controllers and soil-enrichers, beavers would restore much-needed biodiversity to Britain’s regimented countryside, argues Derek Gow

A beaver kit born in the wild on the River Otter — part of a project managed by the Devon Wildlife Trust. Credit: Alamy 
issue 12 September 2020

Conservationists are frequently criticised for focusing on glamorous species at the expense of others equally important but unluckily uglier — pandas rather than pangolins, birds rather than bats, and monkeys rather than mole-rats. Europe’s frankly lumpy largest rodent, the European beaver, Castor fiber, is therefore fortunate to have found an ardent advocate in Derek Gow.

Beavers have always attracted attention, generally of the wrong kind. Not only do they have lustrous pelts, and flesh edible even in times of fasting (because conveniently classified as ‘fish’) but castoreum, exuded from sacs near their anal glands, which they use to scent mark territory, was thought to have medico-mystical properties. Medieval apiarists believed it made bees more productive, it was the original castor in castor oil (it can contain salicylic acid, aspirin’s main ingredient), and it is still used to add ‘leather’ notes to perfumes.

According to legend, St Felix of Burgundy was rescued from drowning in Norfolk by beavers

In Britain’s relatively small riparian spaces, the beaver seems to have become rare in England as early as Anglo-Saxon times.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in