As I wrote earlier, a large proportion of Andrew Lansley’s white paper had to be devoted to accountability. Much
of it is, but little is explained. Patients are central. The creation of GP consortia is for their benefit and they will hold the consortia to account by excercising choice (4:21). Choice is the tyrannical panacea that does not exist. A patient can only
improve a treatment if they are given it; and many GPs are closer to Doctor In the House rather than Dr.House. GPs are independent practitioners working within the NHS framework. For example, it is
impossible for the patient to make recommendations about unavailable cancer drugs.
In addition to the patient, the NHS Commissioning Board will regulate the consortia. According to a turgid paragraph on page 35 of the white paper, the Commissioning Board will allocate resources, manage a revenue limit and promote productivity.
Get Britain's best politics newsletters
Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in