The exhibition The Renaissance and Dream at the Musée du Luxembourg in Paris (until 26 January 2014) explores how artists have wrestled with the furthest limits of the imagination, in forms ranging from the muscular elegance of Michelangelo to the luminous naivety of Lorenzo Lotto.
In tackling a subject as inexhaustibly popular as dreams, the exhibition has avoided being either nebulous or anachronistic. Freudian psychoanalysis is mentioned only once in passing, and the paintings are allowed to speak for themselves. What’s more, these artists were not depicting their own dreams. They were plundering from history, myth and religion in a quest for vision unimpeded by time, place or conventional imagery. The representation of dreams is claimed as a metaphor for art itself: a space of hermetic separation and unconscious creativity, perhaps even the product of divine inspiration. But works such as Jacopo Zucchi’s ‘Amor and Psyche’ and El Greco’s ‘The Dream of Philip II’ suggest that dreams became an excuse to present humanity at its most fleshy, anchored by the materiality of paint and canvas.
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in