Stephen Pettitt celebrates the new wave of masterful British productions
Samuel Johnson famously defined opera in his A Dictionary of the English Language as ‘an exotic and irrational entertainment’. It’s possibly the most overquoted quotation concerning the subject, but in 1755, when the dictionary was published, he probably had a point. Opera, which for some time had not exactly been all the rage in London anyway, was still dominated by the Italians and was still centred around the singing. The leading sopranos and castrati were every bit as much the idols of audi- ences as the Callases and Domingos. Yet there were signs of hope, however, for those who liked their opera to be real, engaging, concentrated drama. Composers like Niccolò Jommelli were beginning to push opera towards the principles shortly to be adopted by Gluck, in his first ‘reform’ opera, Orfeo ed Euridice, in 1762. In reform opera, drama ruled the stage, as had been the intention of opera’s inventors back in the late 16th century.
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in