Philip Hensher

Donna Tartt can do the thrills but not the trauma

Philip Hensher reviews The Goldfinch

‘The Goldfinch’ by Carl Fabritius, the theft of which is central to Donna Tartt’s new novel. The Bridgeman Art Library 
issue 12 October 2013

Donna Tartt is an expert practitioner of what David Hare has called ‘the higher hokum’. She publishes a long novel every decade or so. Her first book, The Secret History (1992), was about some highly affected college students who took to studying ancient Greek in a cult and murdering one another in Dionysiac revels. It was a genuinely popular success — chic, macabre and supremely well-constructed.

Her second, The Little Friend (2002), pursued a small girl through her attempts to pin the murder of her brother on the wrong culprit. It confirmed Tartt’s gift for an intricate plot, escalating into some furiously exciting action. The handling of suspense in both these novels was first-rate. The aura of class — ancient Greek, Americans called Bunny, Camilla and Julian, the impact of death down the years on child narrators — was inescapable.

And the psychological analysis was enjoyable too, though not especially truthful. One of Tartt’s favourite tropes was to associate the original traumatic event with some quite trivial property.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in