On Donald Trump’s orders, US forces have struck the airfield from which the Syrian military launched Tuesday’s chemical weapons attack. The strikes were limited, only 59 Tomahawk missiles were involved, and the US says that ‘every precaution was taken to execute this strike with minimal risk to personnel at the airfield’.
So, what was Trump up to? Well, it was clear that he wanted to send a message that the use of chemical weapons is unacceptable and will have consequences. He was, ironically, enforcing the red line that the Obama administration drew and then refused to enforce. But he was trying to do so in a way that does not drag the US further into the conflict or risk World War Three; note that the Russians were warned about the strikes before they happened so that their forces didn’t get caught up in them.
Fraser Nelson discusses Trump’s Syrian intervention with James Forsyth and Freddy Gray on Coffee House Shots:
The UK government has backed the Trump administration’s stance, and rightly so.
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in