Samuel Brittan

Don’t panic — a hung parliament might be good

Ignore the alarmists, says Samuel Brittan, there is nothing to fear from minority government. Our political system might even benefit from it

issue 13 March 2010

Although I have been a reader of The Spectator almost since I have been in short trousers I have rarely been as irritated by an article as I was by last week’s cover story, ‘Britain must be saved from the financial abyss’. Its author, Allister Heath, is by no means a lone voice: he speaks for a considerable number of vocal, if unrepresentative people in the City who believe a hung parliament would mean weak government and fiscal peril. This view is profoundly mistaken.

The implication of this argument is that, even to Conservative voters, a Labour victory would be preferable to a House of Commons where neither of the two main parties has an overall majority. It would then follow that, in a constituency where the Lib Dems — or any other minor party — has a chance of prevailing over Labour, a Conservative voter should vote Labour to minimise the chances of a ‘hung parliament’.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in