Rory Sutherland Rory Sutherland

Don’t look for any merit in meritocracy

Whether it’s property or DNA, we love to pretend that we earned what we in fact inherited

issue 03 June 2017

A few years ago, someone asked me how to fix social care costs for the elderly. One eventual idea of ours was that, at age 65, people could pledge to pay a higher level of inheritance tax as a form of insurance against social care costs. If, say, you pledged £20,000 of the value of your estate, you would receive an annuity worth perhaps £150,000 should you develop dementia or need long-term care.

This, we thought, would be appealing enough to be made voluntary. The idea was designed to align with a known property of human psychology called Prospect Theory, which  shows that people much prefer a small, certain loss to a small chance of a larger loss. Put simply, people prefer a definite 80 per cent of something to risking a 7 per cent chance of getting nothing. Economists describe this as irrational, or as a bias, but it is easy to see why our brains evolved this way.

The lesson for anyone designing new policies is to talk to psychologists as well as economists.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in