Kristina Murkett

Does Shakespeare tell us how Succession will end?

It's King Lear for the modern generation

  • From Spectator Life
[Sky/Home Box Office, Inc.]

The award-winning Succession is many things. Now in its fourth series, it has been compared with a Renaissance painting, a Greek tragedy, a Jane Austen novel, and a psychoanalytical allegory of trauma responses (Kendall – fight; Connor – flight; Shiv – fawn; Roman – freeze).

Ultimately, however, it is a Shakespearean series. The writers may have swapped the battlefield for the boardroom and armies for anxious shareholders, but the show’s character studies and themes – power, family, politics, betrayal, revenge – are Shakespearean in their complexity and circularity. Only instead of soliloquies, we have a lot more raised eyebrows, death-stares and ‘uh-huhs’. There’s even a playwright called Willa.

Like Shakespeare himself, the writers have taken from a variety of sources. There are numerous allusions to Hamlet: Logan describes hearing bad news over the phone as ‘dripping poison in [his] ear’. His existential pondering in season four, episode one (‘I mean what are people? What are people?’) riffs off Hamlet’s ‘What a piece of work is man!’ speech.

Get Britain's best politics newsletters

Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in