Laura Gascoigne

Does gender matter? Making Modernism, at the Royal Academy, reviewed

This exhibition bundles together several disparate but fascinating female artists – but only one paints the skeleton under the flesh

A modern Pietà: ‘Woman with Dead Child’, 1903, by Käthe Kollwitz. Credit: © Käthe Kollwitz Museum Köln 
issue 26 November 2022

 The catalogue to Making Modernism opens with an acknowledgment from the Royal Academy’s first female president, Rebecca Salter, that in the past it has overlooked women artists. To compensate, it has bundled seven – four headliners and three of their lesser-known contemporaries – into this one show.

Excluded from official art schools and reliant on private tuition and ‘ladies’ academies’, these seven women escaped the feminine curse of the three ‘Ks’ – Kinder, Küche, Kirche (children, kitchen and church) – to forge independent careers in Germany before the first world war. They didn’t constitute an art movement, though Gabriele Münter and Marianne Werefkin – both comfortably off – facilitated one. Every avant-garde movement needs a base, preferably with hospitality provided, and German expressionism was generously supplied with two in Werefkin’s ‘pink salon’ in Munich and Münter’s Bavarian holiday home in Murnau. It was in Murnau, where Münter and Wassily Kandinsky spent pre-war summers with Werefkin and Alexei Jawlensky in what became known as ‘the Russians’ House’, that the seeds of The Blue Rider were sown.

Kollwitz never lets you forget the skeleton under the flesh

The Italian Erma Bossi was drawn into the Russians’ orbit, but the other artists here had little in common.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in