Kate Chisholm

Digital deadline

It was such a shock. At first I couldn’t understand what was going on. Why were they all talking about Sid as if he was in the past?

issue 26 June 2010

It was such a shock. At first I couldn’t understand what was going on. Why were they all talking about Sid as if he was in the past?

It was such a shock. At first I couldn’t understand what was going on. Why were they all talking about Sid as if he was in the past? I’d only been away for a few days. Surely nothing really major could have happened in Ambridge in the meantime? And especially not to Sid, who as far as I knew was safely ensconced in New Zealand on the trip of a lifetime to meet his new grandson. I listened to the next episode and still had no clue. A party for Sid? But he’s not around. Jolene in tears? But she’s usually such a toughie.

A very nasty trick has been played on us by the scriptwriters.

Get Britain's best politics newsletters

Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in