Robert Tombs Robert Tombs

Did the Suffragettes really win women the vote?

(Photo: Getty)

I suppose most people regard the Suffragettes as the exemplary vindication of the right to carry out illegal direct action in a righteous cause. Speaking in support of Extinction Rebellion, Helen Pankhurst, a descendant of the Suffragette leader, said that both movements were equally ‘socially marginalised, made fun of, considered to be extremists, and legally silenced, and yet they stand up for justice in the way the Suffragettes did.’

Rather than pushing on a slowly opening door, they preferred to throw a brick through the window

The Suffragette campaign was the first deliberately violent English political campaign since the 1840s, and this is part of its myth. Thankfully no one was killed during its campaign, other than the unfortunate Emily Davison. However, the leading feminist Millicent Fawcett, leader of the law-abiding National Union of Women’s Suffrage Societies, called the Suffragettes ‘the most powerful allies the antisuffragists have.’ Did the Suffragettes really advance political rights for women? Is violent disruption the way to go? The answer, 105 years after votes for women were legislated, is not simple.

Written by
Robert Tombs

Robert Tombs is an emeritus professor in history at the University of Cambridge and the author of This Sovereign Isle: Britain in and out of Europe (Allen Lane, 2021). He also edits the History Reclaimed website

Topics in this article

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in