Inevitably, at this time of year, it has been a fortnight dominated by cricket. It began in extraordinary fashion. The Oval, where I was working, became the scene of a unique event in the sport: the first time that a Test match had been forfeited by one team refusing to take the field. The team was Pakistan and the umpire who sparked off the row was Darrell Hair, after he accused the Pakistan team of cheating. In the commentary box we scoured hours of footage to try to find any visual evidence of ball-tampering, but we couldn’t find a thing. Since then I have not changed my opinion: if there was ball-tampering, it was minor and therefore could and should have been handled with far greater sensitivity by the umpire in question. A quiet word with Inzamam-ul-Haq, at the point at which Hair was concerned, and none of this would have happened.
Diary – 1 September 2006
Inevitably, at this time of year, it has been a fortnight dominated by cricket
issue 02 September 2006
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in