Mary Killen Mary Killen

Dear Mary | 3 April 2010

Your problems solved

issue 03 April 2010

Q. My great-granddaughter’s parent’s relationship did not survive. The child’s mother now has another daughter. As I have the means to give my great-granddaughter education in the private sector, I have offered this, but the child’s mother wants both daughters educated at the same school for family harmony. Is there anything that you could suggest other than paying for both and using the inheritance of my great-granddaughter for this other non-related child? Thank you cordially.

Name and address withheld

A. I have consulted a veteran of the same dilemma. In the 1970s her very bright daughter was accepted at Godolphin, a London girls’ school which, at that time, was first choice for quality of education. Godolphin was then grant-aided and completely free. Yet she also had a son whom she knew would not pass the exam for Latymer, the equivalent boys’ school. For family harmony she therefore sent both children to London’s then notorious Holland Park comprehensive. She takes up the tale. ‘My daughter, now 50, has never forgiven me. You must definitely send your great-grand-daughter to the private school. If the mother makes light of it and lets the second girl see she has not been personally differentiated against then, rather than causing resentment, her sister’s different education should act as a stimulus to her. It will pace her and give her a motive for trying to do better.’ The mother should see that such two-pronged schooling benefits both girls. Rather than confining them in their own cliques, it will broaden their horizons and their social access in both directions.

Q. I enjoy an enduring correspondence with my former history master who suggested recently that the appellation ‘Esq’ on the envelopes of my letters to him was antiquated and may be suggestive of the addressee’s advanced years.

GIF Image

You might disagree with half of it, but you’ll enjoy reading all of it

TRY 3 MONTHS FOR $5
Our magazine articles are for subscribers only. Start your 3-month trial today for just $5 and subscribe to more than one view

Comments

Join the debate for just £1 a month

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for £3.

Already a subscriber? Log in