Mary Killen Mary Killen

Dear Mary | 22 February 2018

Also: Shooting etiquette, and a brilliant way to reduce complaining

issue 24 February 2018

Q. Obviously one is delighted to have visits from close friends and family when one’s spouse is ailing, but how does one politely deter those in what might be called the second division who, mindful of the Bible’s teaching, are intent on visiting the sick, when the sick and his wife would rather be left alone and only wish for supportive emails promising thoughts and prayers? Visitors require feeding and watering, which entails shopping trips and general labour in the form of tidying the house and getting in flowers etc. They need meeting off trains and taking to the station and the whole enterprise causes great stress when one is reeling from shock and exhaustion.
— Name and address withheld

A. You can kindly discourage the second division by responding to their overtures with an insistence that you know it would accelerate the recovery of the patient far more if he were able to look forward to visiting them in their own homes. Say ‘Let’s wait till the weather is better and he is feeling stronger.’ This should put them off, but they will still feel they have discharged their responsibility.

Q. My wife and I are lucky enough to be able to invite guests shooting at home each year. We generally invite them to shoot during the day followed by dinner in the evening. Sometimes my friends reply that they’d love to come shooting but are already busy in the evening. I don’t want to fall out with them but find this behaviour difficult. Am I unreasonable to find this picking and choosing irritating and, if not, how best to nip it in the bud?
— Name and address withheld

A. You are not unreasonable to find it irritating but if you especially want them to ‘shoot and stay’ then you are unreasonable in failing to decree that if they can’t come to the dinner, they can’t come at all.

GIF Image

You might disagree with half of it, but you’ll enjoy reading all of it

TRY 3 MONTHS FOR $5
Our magazine articles are for subscribers only. Start your 3-month trial today for just $5 and subscribe to more than one view

Comments

Join the debate for just £1 a month

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for £3.

Already a subscriber? Log in