Matthew Parris Matthew Parris

Day by day through someone else’s life

Is the book — the solid, rectangular repository of the whole damn thing, from Chapter 1 to Chapter 32 — always and in principle the superior vehicle for a story?

issue 03 September 2011

Is the book — the solid, rectangular repository of the whole damn thing, from Chapter 1 to Chapter 32 — always and in principle the superior vehicle for a story?

Is the book — the solid, rectangular repository of the whole damn thing, from Chapter 1 to Chapter 32 — always and in principle the superior vehicle for a story? I ask because among readers of a reactionary cast of mind (among whom I sometimes count myself) an assumption has arisen that ‘the book’, the physical book, that satisfying lump of a thing you can hold in your hands, is the ideal, the Platonic ‘form’, the ultimate reality; while all other vessels for words — the Kindle, the audiobook, the broadcast or electronic instalment — are but shadows on the walls of Plato’s cave.

But travelling on the Continent over the past two weeks I have wondered not only whether the physical book is always the best but, more radically, whether it is in fact the primal Platonic form; or whether, rather, the book is not just another shadow on the cave’s wall; and in the Beginning is the Word.

I’ve been reading Mabel Eden’s diaries, transmitted in daily instalments (every midnight) online.

Get Britain's best politics newsletters

Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in