Matthew Parris Matthew Parris

Day by day through someone else’s life

Is the book — the solid, rectangular repository of the whole damn thing, from Chapter 1 to Chapter 32 — always and in principle the superior vehicle for a story?

issue 03 September 2011

Is the book — the solid, rectangular repository of the whole damn thing, from Chapter 1 to Chapter 32 — always and in principle the superior vehicle for a story?

Is the book — the solid, rectangular repository of the whole damn thing, from Chapter 1 to Chapter 32 — always and in principle the superior vehicle for a story? I ask because among readers of a reactionary cast of mind (among whom I sometimes count myself) an assumption has arisen that ‘the book’, the physical book, that satisfying lump of a thing you can hold in your hands, is the ideal, the Platonic ‘form’, the ultimate reality; while all other vessels for words — the Kindle, the audiobook, the broadcast or electronic instalment — are but shadows on the walls of Plato’s cave.

But travelling on the Continent over the past two weeks I have wondered not only whether the physical book is always the best but, more radically, whether it is in fact the primal Platonic form; or whether, rather, the book is not just another shadow on the cave’s wall; and in the Beginning is the Word.

I’ve been reading Mabel Eden’s diaries, transmitted in daily instalments (every midnight) online.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in