So Sir Richard Dannatt has departed the Tory fold almost as curiously as he
entered it. Sure, have been no gaffes from Chris Grayling this time around – but when it was announced last October
that the former head of the Army was advising David Cameron, it was widely expected that he’d graduate to become a peer and a minister in any Tory government. But today he announces his
“retirement” as neither.
The Tories are downplaying all this, eager to avoid a repeat of the speculation that surrounded Sir Alan Budd’s departure. And, to be fair, there are few signs, as yet, that this is a viciously unamicable split. But I’d be surprised if both parties hadn’t thought that there were a few too many cooks stirring the defence broth – and that one of them could do to shuffle off the scene. After all, Dannatt has clashed with the new Chief of Defence staff, General Sir David Richards.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33b44/33b44f1966e79a8bbc533866eeb159e672891b43" alt=""
Get Britain's best politics newsletters
Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in