Alan Powers

Concrete and carbuncles

Alan Powers on architecture

issue 14 June 2008

‘London smells Tory,’ announced Ian Martin, the Beachcomber of architectural journalism post-Boris in his weekly column in the Architects’ Journal. Heritage wars have broken out over the future of a concrete housing scheme, Robin Hood Gardens in East London by Alison and Peter Smithson, that is beloved of architects, but not, it seems, of many others. The Guardian devoted a page to complaints from classical architects that they were excluded en bloc from the Riba awards that lead to the Stirling Prize, and The Spectator is shortly to conduct a debate on whether Prince Charles’s opinion, delivered nearly 25 years ago, concerning glass stumps and monstrous carbuncles, remains as valid today.

Does architectural style have a simple relationship to political position? The early years of New Labour, when Richard Rogers was in the ascendant, may have given the impression that people would be made to like what they were told was good for them. In the Götterdämmerung of Gordon Brown, the architecture minister, Margaret Hodge, has made her name by opposition to the claims of modern buildings to be considered as heritage. Lady Thatcher once bought a neo-Georgian house in Dulwich, and was ridiculed by the architectural establishment for it. Michael Heseltine commissioned neoclassical outbuildings by Quinlan Terry, and, to some extent, both were behaving true to type. Indifference and ignorance are more typical of politicians’ understanding of architecture, however, than informed choice. Ken Livingstone supported high buildings in London, and it was as natural as Tweedledum and Tweedledee that Boris Johnson should oppose them.

If we could discover what a majority of people thought about architecture, would a party be willing to adopt it to win votes? The Cameronian emphasis on quality of life, which includes the condition of cities and countryside rather than the face-masks of individual buildings, comes closer to issues capable of stirring an electorate.

GIF Image

You might disagree with half of it, but you’ll enjoy reading all of it

TRY 3 MONTHS FOR $5
Our magazine articles are for subscribers only. Start your 3-month trial today for just $5 and subscribe to more than one view

Comments

Join the debate for just £1 a month

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for £3.

Already a subscriber? Log in