Giannandrea Poesio

Compare and contrast | 24 May 2008

<strong>Royal Ballet: Double Bill<br /> </strong><em>Royal Opera House</em>

issue 24 May 2008

Royal Ballet: Double Bill

Royal Opera House

Theatre magic has a lot to do with the unpredictability of the performed event. Regardless of the alluring promise of an all-star cast or the doubts raised by daring artistic choices, there is no certain way to forecast what any live performance will be like. Indeed, it is this surprise/disappointment factor that has kept me going for all the years I have spent both on stage and in front of it.

Last week I expressed some serious doubts about a Royal Ballet triple bill. The artistic flatness of the performances I saw impinged seriously on my desire to see more from the same company. But last Saturday I left the Royal Opera feeling in that very good mood so rarely experienced by critics.

Not unlike the previous triple bill, the new programme contrasts a 20th-century masterwork of American ballet history with a milestone of the British 20th-century repertoire.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in