Iain Macwhirter Iain Macwhirter

Closing the Rosebank and Jackdaw oil fields is a net zero own goal

Climate activists demonstrate against the Rosebank and Jackdaw oil fields (Credit: Getty images0

Environmental campaigners are hoping to announce at Cop29 that they’ve halted two major oil and gas fields in the North Sea. A crucial court battle over the fate of the the Rosebank and Jackdaw fields began in the Court of Session in Edinburgh today. 

The greens smell victory over evil fossil fuel companies. But closing these two fields won’t advance net zero by a single day since we will still have to import oil and gas from abroad.

Shell, Equinor and Ithaca had received consent from the North Sea Transiton Authority last September to proceed with drilling in the fields following an environment impact assessment (EIA). However, Greenpeace and Uplift, who are bringing the judicial review, argue that is unlawful because it didn’t take into account the environmental impact of burning the oil and gas down stream, when it is used as fuel. The UK government agrees with them, it seems. 

Keir Starmer is not contesting the claim that the drilling in Jackdaw and Rosebank is unlawful and seems to be leaving it to the fossil fuel companies to make the case for continuing.

Written by
Iain Macwhirter

Iain Macwhirter is a former BBC TV presenter and was political commentator for The Herald between 1999 and 2022. He is an author of Road to Referendum and Disunited Kingdom: How Westminster Won a Referendum but Lost Scotland.

Topics in this article

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in