As Paul Goodman notes, being Prime Minister means taking risks. So perhaps we shouldn’t be
surprised to read in the Times (£) that, during his recent trip to Afghanistan, the security threat
to David Cameron was more urgent than previously thought:
“At the time Downing Street played down the incident, saying that it should not be seen as a huge security issue. But The Times can reveal that senior military figures are demanding changes to the way in which future visits to war zones by Mr Cameron and other senior Whitehall figures are conducted. They believe that the Taleban knew which helicopter was carrying Mr Cameron and are deeply concerned over the increasingly sophisticated nature of the enemy’s intelligence operation. One Whitehall source suggested that the threat, on June 10, was ‘much closer than anyone said at the time’. Although no shots were fired, two Taleban conversations about an attack were intercepted, the second containing precise information about the helicopter containing the Prime Minister.
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in