Further to James’s post, Bush’s invocation of The Quiet American in his speech was either compellingly smart or astonishingly foolhardy:
The argument that America’s presence in Indochina was dangerous had a long pedigree. In 1955, long before the United States had entered the war, Graham Greene wrote a novel called, “The Quiet American.” It was set in Saigon, and the main character was a young government agent named Alden Pyle. He was a symbol of American purpose and patriotism — and dangerous naivete. Another character describes Alden this way: “I never knew a man who had better motives for all the trouble he caused.”
Now, the President’s point is that, whatever the troubles America caused, Pyle’s motives in Indochina (the spread of freedom, by force if necessary) were essentially right and what he goes on to call “the Graham Greene argument” for withdrawal was essentially wrong. But – talk about walking into a literary and philosophical snake-pit! Bush could not have selected a text more suitable to the purposes of his foes, for The Quiet American is, above all else, a debate about the folly of soi-disant idealism in foreign policy, in which the world-weary British journalist Thomas Fowler and the covert US operator Pyle fight symbolically for the heart of the young Vietnamese girl Phuong.
Britain’s best politics newsletters
You get two free articles each week when you sign up to The Spectator’s emails.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate, free for a month
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first month free.
UNLOCK ACCESS Try a month freeAlready a subscriber? Log in